How do you keep a franchise fresh? Not by doing half of what this film did.
I showed this simply because it was exactly what was wrong with the start of both of these films. Films are much better when you don’t know what’s going to happen. When you have no idea what you’re about to see. If you get all of it in the trailer or in leaks or whatever, you don’t really have a reason to watch it. At the start of this thing, the editor decided (or the studio) to do a two minute montage of a lot of what you’re about to see. It ruins the film. Furthermore, the most daring stunt I think I’ve seen any one do that isn’t Jackie Chan, is right before the opening credits. Now this may have been to set the tone but, nothing you do as a director/actor, in any movie, will be as daring as having your key talent, hang off the side of a plane. With no green screen… No… Anything. That was actually Mr. Cruise. If you’re gonna do a stunt like that. Don’t open a film with that if nothing else is going to be as daring. That one scene is impressive when you factor in his role, and that he’s 50. Anything could have gone wrong. Thankfully it didn’t.
Anyway. You know who this movie was missing. Paula Patton. I’m probably going to say that again.
The story was rather expected. But the intensity was is what kept the story on its edge. It definitely was missing something from M.I. 4… which was probably Paula Patton. But seriously, in M.I. 3 there was a villain who jxust hated Ethan Hunt and you secretly cheered him on for how relentless he was. I’m not saying he had to recreate that flair but it would’ve been nice to just have a villain to really see get taken down or out. Sean Harris’ overall villainy just seemed flat. So much so, that I don’t even believe he was the end game villain as his role intended. There was so much time spent on being accountable for the amount of damage the IMF cause(in the film), that the American political brass seemed more of a threat than Solomon Lane.
The film brought in a new group of talent that these films tend to. The lead female was very good at her role. If I didn’t know what I know, to see her forthcoming deception, I would have thought her performance brilliant (another reason not to show scenes before its time). Nevertheless I saw past it and saw a decent performance and arguably one of the best female leads this series has seen. Definitely not the hottest… Hi Paula!
Tom Cruise was great. He did his usual running and yelling gig. I feel he’s reached the top of his limits within this character. I’d be lying if I didn’t say his age was revealed a few times in this. Not that it hurts him, but it’s just so much on the surface. Now, I’m not trying to witch hunt him out of a job, but I’d be totally ok if he said his wife or something had a kid and he trained him in the IMF as it’s all he knows. Then that said child carried on the franchise. I just think we all know he will stop at nothing to protect us. I will say having him doubted like that, both visually artistically, was a cool dynamic to add.
THE one thing about Tom Cruise, is that he runs. No one in film will have a better run than him. Not shooting it correctly is a tragedy. even though they have shots of him running, they often had it in the wrong angles. The best one he has is during the opening sequence. The under water scene was outstanding. I caught myself inching to the edge of my seat.
Go figure I didn’t like it, it was as obvious a movie as Iron Man 3 was.
- Overall rating of the movie: 4 out of 10,
- Cinematography: 5 out of 10,
- Editing: 2 out of 10,
- Audio: 6 out of 10,
- Acting: 5 out of 10,
Theatres or wait for the blu-ray? It’s cool in Imax but the bad taste in your mouth after wouldn’t justify paying to see it there.
THAT’S IT! Cheers: “To Peace”. Your eLEWsive Thought Provided by: the “LEW System”
– Xavier – @CoolyoNgeLEW